This can be description for the various kinds of paper at COLING 2018

This can be description for the various kinds of paper at COLING 2018

It is essential to select the paper that is right to be able to assist get high quality reviews for the work. Keep in mind that all paper kinds utilize the template that is same download the phrase and LaTeX templates here: coling2018.zip

Computationally-aided analysis that is linguistic

The main focus of the paper kind is brand new insight that is linguistic. It could take the type of an empirical research of some linguistic occurrence, or of the theoretical outcome about a linguistically-relevant system that is formal.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: From the means the paper is created, are you able to inform exactly what research concern ended up being addressed, that which was done and exactly why, and exactly how the outcomes relate solely to the investigation concern?
  3. Originality: How http://eliteessaywriters.com/blog/psychology-research-paper-topics initial and revolutionary could be the research described? Originality could possibly be within the linguistic concern being addressed, into the methodology put on the linguistic concern, or in the blend of this two.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: could be the research described in the paper theoretically sound and correct? Is one to trust the claims associated with the paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments and tend to be the total results correctly interpreted?
  5. Reproducibility: will there be adequate information for somebody in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcome? n/a for several kinds of theoretical results
  6. Data/code supply: may be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the investigation community or is here a compelling explanation offered why it is not possible?
  7. Generalizability: Does the paper show just how the outcomes generalize, either by deepening our knowledge of some system that is linguistic basic or by showing methodology that may be put on other issues aswell? n/a for many forms of theoretical results
  8. Significant contrast: Does the paper clearly position the described make use of respect to literature that is existing? Will it be clear both what exactly is novel within the extensive research presented and just how it develops on earlier in the day work?
  9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for the full-length paper, or wouldn’t it take advantage of further development?
  10. General suggestion: there are numerous good submissions contending for slots at COLING 2018; essential could it be to feature that one? Will people discover a complete lot by scanning this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is way better to vary from other reviewers rather than grade every thing at the center.

NLP engineering experiment paper

This paper kind matches the bulk of submissions at present CL and NLP conferences.

  1. Relevance: Is it paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: Through the method the paper is created, could you inform exactly what research question ended up being addressed, the thing that was done and exactly why, and just how the outcome connect with the investigation concern?
    1. Can it be clear what the authors’ hypothesis is? The facts? A text input reponse
    2. Will it be clear the way the writers have actually tested their theory? y/n
  3. Originality: How initial and revolutionary may be the research described? Remember that originality could include a unique strategy or a fresh task, or it might lie when you look at the careful analysis of what are the results whenever an understood strategy is placed on a known task (where in actuality the pairing is novel) or in the careful analysis of what are the results when a known strategy is put on a understood task in a brand new language.
  4. Technical correctness/soundness: could be the extensive research described in the paper theoretically sound and proper? Is one able to trust the claims regarding the paper—are they sustained by the analysis or experiments and tend to be the total results precisely interpreted?
    1. Could it be clear how the total outcomes confirm/refute the theory, or will be the outcomes inconclusive?
    2. Perform some writers explain the way the outcomes follow from their hypothesis (rather than state, other feasible confounding factor)?
    3. Will be the datasets utilized obviously described and so are they right for testing the theory as previously mentioned?
  5. Reproducibility: can there be adequate detail for somebody in identical industry to reproduce/replicate the outcomes?
  6. Data/code supply: could be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or is here a reason that is compelling why it is not possible?
  7. Error analysis: Does the paper provide an error that is thoughtful, which actively seeks linguistic habits into the forms of mistakes produced by the system(s) examined and sheds light on either avenues for future work or perhaps the supply of the strengths/weaknesses for the systems?
  8. Significant contrast: Does the paper clearly position the described make use of respect to literature that is existing? Can it be clear both what exactly is novel within the extensive research presented and how it builds on previous work?
  9. Substance: performs this paper have sufficient substance for the paper that is full-length or wouldn’t it take advantage of further work?
  10. General suggestion: there are lots of submissions that are good for slots at COLING 2018; essential will it be to feature that one? Will people learn a complete great deal by scanning this paper or seeing it presented? Please be decisive—it is much better to change from other reviewers rather than grade every thing in the centre.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *